top of page

Creation Myths in Old Norse Cosmogony: Ginnungagap, Fire, and Ice

Writer's picture: Scott McNealScott McNeal

In the tapestry of Old Norse mythology, few accounts are as compelling or as foundational as the story of how the cosmos was formed out of the primordial void, Ginnungagap. These creation myths, primarily recorded in Snorri Sturluson’s Prose Edda and alluded to in the Poetic Edda, form the bedrock of the ancient Norse worldview. The interplay between fiery Múspellsheimr (also spelled “Muspelheim”) and icy Niflheimr illuminates the dynamic nature of creation—fire melts ice, ice tempers fire, and life emerges from their meeting. From the very beginnings of existence to the slaying of the primeval giant Ymir and the shaping of Midgard, the Norse cosmogony offers a vivid look at how the ancient Norse conceptualized their place in a vast and often perilous universe.

This blog post will explore these primordial events, basing the discussion on primary sources—mainly the Prose Edda (composed by Snorri Sturluson in the early 13th century) and poems from the Poetic Edda (preserved in the 13th-century Codex Regius). We will also draw upon reputable academic works that analyze these sources, ensuring a sound understanding grounded in verifiable scholarship.

 

Sources and Context

The Prose Edda—sometimes referred to simply as the “Edda” or “Snorra Edda”—is the principal prose account of Old Norse mythology. Compiled by Snorri Sturluson, it includes the section known as “Gylfaginning” (“The Deluding of Gylfi”), which provides a detailed narrative of cosmological events, deities, giants, and other figures. According to Anthony Faulkes, who produced a widely used English translation, the Prose Edda is “one of the most extensive accounts we have of Norse mythology, written at a time when knowledge of ancient traditions was already fading” (Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, Introduction).

The Poetic Edda—a collection of Old Norse poems such as “Völuspá,” “Grímnismál,” and several others—offers a more fragmentary but still invaluable insight into these myths, predating or contemporaneous with Snorri’s work. In “Völuspá,” for instance, the völva (seeress) narrates the creation of the world, the rise of the gods, and the eventual destruction at Ragnarök. While the Poetic Edda is not as linear as Snorri’s prose account, it preserves ancient poetic traditions that illuminate aspects of the cosmogony in language often more cryptic and metaphorical.

Modern scholars such as John Lindow (Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs, 2001) and Carolyne Larrington (The Poetic Edda, 2014) rely on both the Prose and Poetic Eddas to reconstruct and interpret the Norse mythic cosmos. Their works aim to elucidate the complex interplay between these sources, noting that they occasionally diverge or offer alternative versions of the same myths.

 

Ginnungagap: The Primordial Void

At the heart of Old Norse cosmogony is the concept of Ginnungagap, an enormous void that existed before any distinguishable features—before earth, sky, gods, or mortals. Snorri Sturluson states:

“In the beginning…there was nothing, only a vast yawning gap, Ginnungagap. Nor was there sea nor land nor waves; there was only Ginnungagap.”(Prose Edda (Gylfaginning), trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 5)

Scholars debate the etymology of the term Ginnungagap, though it is generally understood to mean “yawning void” or “mighty gap.” In Old Norse, ginn-, a prefix, sometimes implies “vast” or “magical,” and gap means an “empty space” or “chasm.” It is in this void—neither light nor dark, neither hot nor cold—that the stage is set for cosmic creation.

The imagery of Ginnungagap as a cosmic emptiness resonates with other Indo-European myths of a primordial “chaos.” However, in the Norse account, Ginnungagap becomes the meeting place between two opposites that will precipitate creation.

 

Fire Meets Ice: Múspellsheimr and Niflheimr

According to Gylfaginning, two ancient realms existed on opposite ends of Ginnungagap:

  1. Niflheimr (Niflheim) – A realm of intense cold, ice, and darkness, said to contain the well Hvergelmir, from which numerous rivers called Élivágar flow.

  2. Múspellsheimr (Muspelheim) – A realm of fire, guarded by the giant Surtr. It radiates sparks and heat.

Snorri describes these two extremes meeting in the midst of Ginnungagap:

“It was many ages before the earth was created that Niflheim was made… Across Ginnungagap from it lay Múspell, which was bright and hot. The ice from Niflheim and the fires of Múspell met in Ginnungagap, and by the might of that collision, the melted venom [from the Élivágar rivers] dripped and congealed…”(Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 5)

As the fiery heat from Múspellsheimr melts the icy rime from Niflheimr, a series of transformative events takes place. Drips of “venom” or “poison” from the Élivágar come alive, forming the substance that would coalesce into Ymir, the primeval being (sometimes called Aurgelmir in the Poetic Edda). This collision of opposites—scorching heat and biting frost—symbolically underscores the Norse belief that creation itself is born of tension and chaos.

 

The Primeval Giant: Ymir (Aurgelmir)

From the merging of fire and ice in Ginnungagap emerged Ymir, often described in Snorri’s text as the progenitor of the jotnar (giants). The Prose Edda narrates:

“Out of these poisonous drips there grew a being, which took the shape of a man, and this being was named Ymir… From him descend the families of frost giants.”(Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 5)

The Poetic Edda, specifically “Vafþrúðnismál”, refers to him as Aurgelmir and presents him as the ancestor of all giants. John Lindow notes that the dual naming—Ymir in the prose tradition and Aurgelmir in certain poems—reflects the fluid nature of oral tradition and the overlapping sources available to Snorri (Lindow, Norse Mythology, 2001, p. 310).

From Ymir’s sweat while he slept, additional frost giants were birthed:

“There Ymir begot sons and daughters, who grew and multiplied.”(Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 5)

This spontaneous generation highlights a primal, fertile chaos rather than a carefully orchestrated act of creation. Ymir is not an intentional creation of the gods but an unplanned consequence of fire and ice colliding—an embodiment of raw, undirected cosmic power.

 

Auðhumla: The Cosmic Cow

The same molten rime that formed Ymir also produced the cosmic cow, Auðhumla. She appeared to sustain Ymir and, in turn, shaped the lineage of the gods. Snorri writes:

“Next there was the cow Auðhumla… She licked the salty stones for nourishment, and by the end of the first day’s licking, the hair of a man rose from the stones; on the second day, his head; on the third day, he was full-formed. He was called Búri.”(Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 6)

Through her licking, Búri emerged, who fathered Borr, who in turn fathered the trio of gods Odin, Vili, and Vé. This genealogical sequence firmly establishes the divine lineage: from the primordial elements came the cosmic cow, from the cosmic cow came the ancestor of the gods.

Academics have interpreted Auðhumla’s role as signifying nourishment and transformation. As she licks away the salty rime, she reveals new life buried in ice—literally uncovering the future lineage of the Æsir gods. In this sense, Auðhumla is a caretaker for both Ymir and the entire cosmos’ unfolding, albeit passively and without explicit purpose beyond sustenance.

 

The Slaying of Ymir and the Birth of the World

Once Odin, Vili, and Vé had grown powerful, they saw that Ymir’s very existence threatened to perpetuate the chaotic giant brood. Consequently, they slew him. This act of divine violence becomes the catalyst for the shaping of the world:

“They carried Ymir into the middle of Ginnungagap and fashioned the world from him… From his blood they made the sea and lakes; from his flesh the land was formed; from his bones the mountains; from his hair they made the trees… And they made the sky from his skull.”(Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 8)

The cosmos, in typical Norse fashion, is forged from sacrifice. Ymir’s body is systematically dismantled, each part dedicated to an aspect of the living world. This notion parallels other Indo-European myths—most famously, the Vedic myth of Purusha, whose sacrificed cosmic body creates the universe. However, the Norse account retains distinct features, such as using Ymir’s eyebrows to fence off Midgard, the realm of humankind:

“They took his eyebrows and fashioned from them a stronghold against the giants… This is Midgard, the realm of men.”(Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 8)

As Carolyne Larrington notes, “Midgard literally becomes a safe enclosure for humanity, protected from the chaotic powers of the giants” (Larrington, The Poetic Edda, 2014, Introduction). Odin and his brothers thus become the architects of human existence, shaping not only the land but also safeguarding it from the persistent threats of the jotnar.

 

The Formation of Midgard

With Ymir’s corpse repurposed into the raw materials of creation, the gods set about constructing an inhabitable realm for mankind: Midgard (“Middle Enclosure”). The mythic geography in Norse cosmology is often depicted as a great ash tree—Yggdrasil—with the Nine Worlds arranged around it. Yet in the earliest creation, what mattered most was distinguishing the new world of humans from the domains of giants and gods.

Midgard stands between:

  • Jötunheimr, the land of the giants.

  • Ásgarðr, the realm of the Æsir gods.

Odin, Vili, and Vé used Ymir’s eyebrows as Midgard’s perimeter walls. They placed Ymir’s skull overhead as the sky, supporting it with four dwarfs—Norðri, Suðri, Austri, and Vestri—who represent the cardinal directions. His blood became the oceans, thus circumscribing the land where humans would eventually dwell.

In the poem “Grímnismál” from the Poetic Edda, Odin (in disguise) elaborates on the various halls, realms, and features of the cosmos. While it does not recount the creation as thoroughly as Gylfaginning, it offers glimpses of this cosmic architecture. Such references underscore how critical the act of creating Midgard was: it established a buffer zone and a new horizon for life—mortal or otherwise.

 

Mankind’s Genesis

Once Midgard had been fashioned, the gods gave life to the first humans. According to


Gylfaginning:

“They found two logs on the shore and from these created man and woman. Odin gave them breath, Vili gave them reason and movement, and Vé gave them speech and senses. These people were named Ask and Embla.”(Sturluson, Edda, trans. Faulkes, 1987, ch. 9)

In this final act of creation, the gods fully differentiate humanity from the rest of the cosmos. Unlike Ymir, whose conception was accidental, the making of Ask and Embla is a deliberate act. By bestowing breath, reason, and speech, Odin and his brothers complete the foundational architecture of existence:

  1. Ginnungagap: The primordial emptiness.

  2. Niflheimr and Múspellsheimr: The opposing forces of ice and fire.

  3. Ymir: The primordial giant born of these conflicting elements.

  4. Auðhumla: The cosmic cow whose nourishment reveals Búri, leading to Odin, Vili, and Vé.

  5. The Slaying of Ymir: A sacrificial event that births the components of the world.

  6. Midgard: The fortified realm for human life, shaped from Ymir’s body.

  7. Ask and Embla: The first human couple, endowed with divine gifts.

Thus, the cosmos as known to the Norse peoples emerges, setting the stage for all subsequent myths of gods, giants, dwarfs, and other beings who populate the Nine Worlds.

 

Scholarly Interpretations

Modern scholarship has attempted to align these myths with archaeological, linguistic, and comparative analyses:

  • John Lindow, in Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs, emphasizes the structural significance of the Ymir myth. He points out that the cosmogony is both an example of “creation-by-dismemberment” and a means of explaining geographical and physical features (Lindow, 2001, pp. 50–52).

  • Carolyne Larrington, in her translation of the Poetic Edda, notes that while Snorri’s Prose Edda organizes these myths in a coherent sequence, the older poems are more fragmentary and often rely on cryptic allusions (Larrington, 2014, Introduction).

  • Margaret Clunies Ross, in Prolonged Echoes: Old Norse Myths in Medieval Northern Society (1994), analyzes how the creation story underscores the tension between chaos (giants) and cosmos (Æsir), revealing a deep cultural preoccupation with boundary-making and maintaining cosmic order.


One overarching theme is the interplay between chaos and order. By slaying Ymir—an entity of unbounded fertility—the gods impose structure on primordial chaos, constructing realms and delineating boundaries. This cosmic order is, however, always at risk; giants and gods remain in conflict, and eventually, the mythic narrative points forward to Ragnarök, where even the best-laid structures will come undone.

 

Final Thoughts

The creation myths of the Old Norse tradition capture the essence of a world born from a clash of extremes—fire and ice—within the vast emptiness of Ginnungagap. From these swirling opposites sprang Ymir, whose untamed existence prompted the earliest gods—Odin, Vili, and Vé—to fashion the world from his very flesh and blood. This violent yet creative act gave rise to Midgard, the “middle enclosure” for humankind, ultimately setting the cosmos into an ordered (yet precarious) balance.

These accounts, preserved in the Prose Edda and Poetic Edda, illustrate the Norse conception of a universe constantly teetering between life-giving forces and destructive powers. Humanity dwells in a guarded realm, indebted to the divine for existence, but never fully separated from the chaotic energies that engendered all creation. The myths have been studied extensively by scholars such as John Lindow, Carolyne Larrington, and others, confirming both their deep cultural resonance and their significance in comparative mythological frameworks.

Through Ymir’s demise, the Norse cosmos—earth, sky, seas, mountains, trees—came into being. In a final, purposeful act, the gods modeled Ask and Embla from driftwood, breathing thought, speech, and life into them. In the domain of Midgard, humanity stands as both a testament to divine craftsmanship and a mirror of the cosmos’ dualistic origin: formed out of extremes, balanced between gods and giants, and destined to play its part in the ceaseless cycle of creation, conflict, and, one day, destruction.

 

References

  1. Sturluson, Snorri. Edda. Translated by Anthony Faulkes. Everyman, 1987.

    • Primary source for Gylfaginning, detailing cosmological myths such as Ginnungagap, the creation of Ymir, and the formation of Midgard.

  2. The Poetic Edda.

    • A collection of Old Norse poems, including “Völuspá,” “Grímnismál,” and “Vafþrúðnismál,” preserved in the 13th-century Codex Regius. References to Ymir (Aurgelmir) and the world’s creation can be found in these poems.

    • See translations by Carolyne Larrington (The Poetic Edda, Oxford World’s Classics, 2014) and Andy Orchard (The Elder Edda: A Book of Viking Lore, Penguin Classics, 2011).

  3. Lindow, John. Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs. Oxford University Press, 2001.

    • Provides a comprehensive academic overview of Norse myths, including the role of Ymir and creation-by-dismemberment.

  4. Larrington, Carolyne (trans.). The Poetic Edda. Oxford University Press, 2014.

    • A reputable scholarly translation and commentary of major Eddic poems, offering insight into mythic creation themes and the figure of Ymir/Aurgelmir.

  5. Clunies Ross, Margaret. Prolonged Echoes: Old Norse Myths in Medieval Northern Society. Odense University Press, 1994.

    • Discusses the cultural context of Norse myths, including the tension between order and chaos evidenced in the creation narrative.


These creation accounts—by their very nature—speak to a worldview in which conflict and collaboration, chaos and order, define both the birth of existence and its inevitable unraveling. The myths of Ginnungagap, fire, and ice continue to fascinate not only for their dramatic imagery but for the philosophical questions they raise about how the world began, what forces shaped it, and how it might one day end.

 

 
 
 

Commentaires


bottom of page